Recenzija, Prikaz slučaja
Tanja Grmuša ; Fakultet hrvatskih studija, Sveučilište u Zagrebu
| Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (253 KB) | str. 163-167 | citiraj |
Hrčak ID: 255609
Arhiva kategorije: Sažetak
Strategic Use Of Context in the Interpretation of Political Discourses: An Encounter Between Theory of Hegemony and Linguistic Contextualism
Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.06
Vedran Jerbić 
orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-6387 ; Fakultet političkih znanosti, Sveučilište u Zagrebu 
| Fulltext: croatian, pdf (388 KB) | pages 127-160 | cite |
Abstracts
Summary The aim of this paper is to critically assess Quentin Skinner’s linguistic contextualism by using the perspective of Laclau and Mouffe’s theory of hegemony. It strives to show that the theory of hegemony can offer a sort of middle way in the currently dominant discussion between so-called textualists and contextualists. By insisting on the strategic aspect of context in the interpretation of political discourses, Laclau and Mouffe are introducing a model of contextualization that does not follow traditional dichotomies between history and philosophy or particularity of context and universality of ideas. The strategic role of context would simultaneously represent a symptom of the deeper stratification of political language and meaning, and would function as a tool of the transformation of that very context.
Keywords
Theory of Hegemony; Discourse; Context; Antagonism; Skinner; Laclau and Mouffe
Hrčak ID: 255606
URI
O strategijskoj ulozi konteksta u tumačenju političkih diskursa: susret teorije hegemonije i lingvističkog kontekstualizma
Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.06
Vedran Jerbić orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-6387 ; Fakultet političkih znanosti, Sveučilište u Zagrebu
| Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (388 KB) | str. 127-160 | citiraj |
Sažetak
Cilj je ovog rada kritički preispitati metodu lingvističkog kontekstualizma Quentina Skinnera koristeći se uvidima teorije hegemonije Laclaua i Mouffe. Nastoji se pokazati da teorija hegemonije može ponuditi svojevrstan srednji put u danas dominantnoj raspravi između tzv. tekstualista i kontekstualista. Inzistirajući na strateškoj dimenziji konteksta u tumačenju političkih diskursa, Laclau i Mouffe otvaraju mogućnost modela kontekstualizacije koji ne robuje tradicionalnim dihotomijama povijest – filozofija i partikularnost konteksta – univerzalnost ideje, nego je orijentiran spram performativne i retroaktivne dimenzije diskursa te funkcionira unutar okvira antagonističkog razumijevanja politike. Strategijska uloga konteksta bila bi u isto vrijeme simptom dubljih raslojavanja političke dimenzije jezika i značenja te oruđe transformacije samog konteksta.
Ključne riječi
teorija hegemonije; diskurs; kontekst; antagonizam; Skinner; Laclau i Mouffe
Hrčak ID: 255606
Suton međunarodnog liberalnog poretka, dijalektika političke mehanike i novi Vestfalski sistem za 21. vek
Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.05
Neven Cvetićanin ; Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd
Marko Mandić orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-6798 ; Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd
| Puni tekst: srpski, pdf (352 KB) | str. 103-126 | citiraj |
Sažetak
Autori ovog rada nude pregled i analizu uspona i pada međunarodnog liberalnog poretka koji je nastao nakon okončanja Hladnog rata i uspona moći Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Spoljnopolitička agenda jedine posthladnoratovske supersile vođena je idejom stvaranja globalnog poretka utemeljenog na ideologiji (globalnog) liberalizma koja u sebi inkorporira teorije liberalnog mira, demokratskog mira i neoliberalnog institucionalizma. Uspostavljanje tzv. globalnog liberalnog poretka dosada je bilo praćeno brojnim političkim, socijalnim, ekonomskim i bezbednosnim krizama, a trenutnu eru međunarodnih odnosa odlikuju uspon relativne moći “neliberalnih” globalnih aktera, pre svega Kine i Rusije, kao glavnih izazivača svetske dominacije Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, te geopolitički revizionizam i ideološka konfrontacija liberalnih i antiliberalnih snaga širom sveta. Autori ovog rada koriste specifičan analitički metod tzv. dijalektike političke mehanike, koji se oslanja na učenja Friedricha Hegela o dijalektici istorije i Carla Schmitta o fenomenu političkog, kako bi objasnili trenutnu dinamiku međunarodnih odnosa, pokazujući da političko polje “permanentno pulsira” što, u svemu što je društveno i političko, nužno kreira akciju i reakciju, čijom dinamikom se mogu tumačiti i globalna zbivanja kojima upravo prisustvujemo.
Ključne riječi
međunarodni liberalni poredak; dijalektika političke mehanike; prijatelj/neprijatelj; međunarodni odnosi; Vestfalski sistem
Hrčak ID: 255600
The Twilight of the Liberal International Order, The Dialectic of Political Mechanics and the New Westphalian System for the 21st Century
Review article
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.05
Neven Cvetićanin ; Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd
Marko Mandić orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-6798 ; Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd
| Fulltext: serbian, pdf (352 KB) | pages 103-126 | cite |
Abstracts
The authors of this paper offer an overview and analysis of the rise and fall of the liberal international order that emerged after the end of the Cold War and along with the rising power of the United States. The foreign policy agenda of the post-Cold War sole superpower was guided by the idea of creating a global order based on the ideology of liberalism, which incorporates theories of liberal peace, democratic peace and neoliberal institutionalism. The establishment of a liberal order has been accompanied by numerous political, social, economic and security crises. The current era is characterized by the rise of the relative power of global actors, primarily China and Russia, as the main challengers to the world domination of the United States, geopolitical revisionism and ideological struggle around the world. The authors of this paper use the dialectic of political mechanics as a method that relies on the teachings of Friedrich Hegel on the dialectic of history and Carl Schmitt on the phenomenon of the political. The authors advocate the view that the political field “permanently pulsates”, which, in everything that is social and political, necessarily creates action and reaction.
Keywords
Liberal International Order; Dialectic of Political Mechanics; Friend/Enemy; International Relations; Westphalian System
Hrčak ID: 255600
Problem Venezuele u spoljnoj politici Sjedinjenih Država
Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.04
Vladimir Trapara orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-6446 ; Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
| Puni tekst: srpski, pdf (343 KB) | str. 78-102 | citiraj |
Sažetak
Autor se bavi odnosima Sjedinjenih Država i Venezuele zaključno sa aktuelnom predsedničkom krizom ne bi li odgovorio na pitanje kako i zašto je Venezuela postala problem za spoljnu politiku SAD koji zahteva pojačanu pažnju i radikalne mere. Analiza ovih odnosa u toku 20. veka pokazuje da su oni zasnovani na naftnoj međuzavisnosti dveju država. Kada je krajem veka višedecenijsko loše upravljanje naftnim bogatstvom u Venezueli izazvalo društvenu i ekonomsku krizu koja je dovela na vlast Huga Cháveza, spremnog da koristi prihode od nafte protiv interesa regionalne hegemonije SAD, ove su Venezuelu označile kao problem. Američki establišment je prema tom problemu nastupio oportunistički – naftna međuzavisnost je sprečavala da sukob eskalira sve dok aktuelna ekonomsko-politička kriza u Venezueli nakon Chávezove smrti nije dala Washingtonu priliku za konačni obračun sa režimom, po cenu privremenog prekida u trgovini naftom. Godinu i po dana od izbijanja predsednička kriza u Venezueli još nije razrešena, jer se čavistički režim održao, a SAD odustale od vojne intervencije, pa autor nastoji da ukaže na perspektive problema i mogućnosti njegovog prevazilaženja nakon što tekuća pandemija korona virusa bude obuzdana.
Ključne riječi
Venezuela; Sjedinjene Države; spoljna politika; nafta; čavizam
Hrčak ID: 255594
The Venezuela Problem in United States Foreign Policy
Review article
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.04
Vladimir Trapara orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-6446 ; Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
| Fulltext: serbian, pdf (343 KB) | pages 78-102 | cite |
Abstracts
The author deals with the United States and Venezuela relations up to the current presidential crisis, in order to answer how and why Venezuela became a problem for U.S. foreign policy which requires increased attention and radical measures. The analysis of these relations during the 20th century shows that they were based on oil interdependence of the two states. When a decades-long mismanagement of oil riches in Venezuela at the end of the century caused a social and economic crisis that brought to power Hugo Chávez, who was ready to use oil revenues against U.S. regional hegemonic interests, it marked Venezuela as a problem. American establishment treated the problem with opportunism – oil interdependence prevented the conflict from escalating until the current economic and political crisis in Venezuela after the death of Chávez gave Washington an opportunity for the final clash with the regime at the price of a temporary break in the oil trade. A year and a half after the presidential crisis in Venezuela erupted, it has not been resolved yet, for the chavista regime remained in place, while the U.S. gave up on military intervention. The author points to the perspectives of the problem and the possibilities of its overcoming once the current coronavirus pandemic gets contained.
Keywords
Venezuela; United States; Foreign Policy; Oil; Chavism
Hrčak ID: 255594
Between Completing a Formality and Facilitating Democracy: Public and Civil Servants’ Attitudes Towards E-Consultations in Croatia
Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.03
Petra Đurman ; Pravni fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu
| Fulltext: croatian, pdf (700 KB) | pages 53-77 | cite |
Abstracts
Citizens’ involvement in the regulatory process has become a very prominent issue in administrative science and practice. Despite growing and more refined interest in the topic, the complex issue of public participation effectiveness still preoccupies scholars. The existing research generally recognizes the desirability to recognize the perspectives of different actors involved in the participatory process. It also points at the existence of various actors’ perceptions with regard to participation effectiveness. Public consultations represent a common instrument of administrative participation. In Croatia, public consultations (e-consultations since 2013) represent a rather novel instrument for involving the public in the regulatory process, which has not undergone wide scientific analysis. The purpose of this paper is to explore the attitudes of two main categories of actors involved in e-consultations – civil servants and interested public (participants) – in order to answer the research question regarding the existence of different perceptions of e-consultations effectiveness. Research findings, obtained by means of questionnaires and interviews, suggest that civil servants’ and participants’ attitudes significantly differ in the evaluation of public influence as well as in the detection of the main problems related to e-consultations implementation, while the perceptions of the main purposes of e-consultations vary only moderately.
Keywords
E-consultations; Civil Servants; Interested Public (Participants); Attitudes, Croatia
Hrčak ID: 255593
Između ispunjavanja forme i promicanja demokracije: stavovi javnosti i upravnih službenika o e-savjetovanjima u Hrvatskoj
Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.03
Petra Đurman ; Pravni fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu
| Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (700 KB) | str. 53-77 | citiraj |
Sažetak
Uključivanje javnosti u proces izrade propisa vrlo je važno i aktualno pitanje upravne znanosti i prakse. Usprkos rastućem i sve rafiniranijem znanstvenom interesu za temu participacije, kompleksno pitanje njezine djelotvornosti još uvijek zaokuplja pažnju istraživača. Postojeća istraživanja prepoznaju potrebu za uvažavanjem perspektiva uključenih aktera u procesu participacije te ukazuju na postojanje različitih percepcija djelotvornosti participacije. Jedan od najčešće korištenih instrumenata upravne participacije su savjetovanja s javnošću. U Hrvatskoj su savjetovanja sa zainteresiranom javnošću (e-savjetovanja od 2013.) relativno nov instrument participacije javnosti u donošenju propisa i politika, koji nije šire analiziran. Svrha je ovog rada istražiti stavove dviju kategorija aktera uključenih u proces e-savjetovanja – upravnih službenika i zainteresirane javnosti (sudionika) – kako bi se odgovorilo na temeljno istraživačko pitanje o razlici u percepciji djelotvornosti e-savjetovanja. Nalazi istraživanja, prikupljeni metodama upitnika i intervjua, sugeriraju da se stavovi službenika i sudionika značajno razlikuju u ocjeni razine utjecaja javnosti i u detekciji glavnih problema provedbe e-savjetovanja, a umjereno u identificiranju ciljeva e-savjetovanja.
Ključne riječi
e-savjetovanje; upravni službenici; zainteresirana javnost (sudionici); stavovi; Hrvatska
Hrčak ID: 255593
‘Ante Marković’s Political Party’: Alliance of Reform Forces of Yugoslavia – Foundation, Programme and 1990 Elections
Review article
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.58.1.02
Vladimir Filipović ; Libertas međunarodno sveučilište, Zagreb
| Fulltext: croatian, pdf (357 KB) | pages 27-52 | cite |
Abstracts
The article follows the political party Alliance of Reform Forces of Yugoslavia, founded in July 1990 by the last president of the Federal Executive Council of Yugoslavia, Ante Marković. The party was a political action by which Ante Marković wanted to capitalize his own popularity and gain political legitimacy in a democratic system. Article presents the activities and organization of the party from its establishment to participation in the elections in the four Yugoslav republics in 1990 – Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia. Attention is paid to the most important aspects of the party’s program – the market economy and the preservation of the Yugoslav state. At the same time, the article analyses the criticism directed at the party by various political opponents throughout Yugoslavia. Furthermore, the article analyses the unsuccessful participation of the Alliance of Reform Forces of Yugoslavia in the first democratic elections in 1990. It is concluded that the party failed in its activities with regard to approaching the lower classes of society and achieving a significant electoral result against national parties. For the purpose of this article available scientific and memoir literature and extensive newspaper sources were used.
Keywords
Ante Marković; Alliance of Reform Forces of Yugoslavia; 1990 Elections; Reforms; Breakup of Yugoslavia
Hrčak ID: 255592